<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.univ-setif.dz:8888/jspui/handle/123456789/1055" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://dspace.univ-setif.dz:8888/jspui/handle/123456789/1055</id>
  <updated>2026-04-18T07:38:26Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-18T07:38:26Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>ACRICE 2017 PROCEEDINGS FINAL VERSION</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://dspace.univ-setif.dz:8888/jspui/handle/123456789/1057" />
    <author>
      <name>ACRICE 2017</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://dspace.univ-setif.dz:8888/jspui/handle/123456789/1057</id>
    <updated>2017-11-13T11:59:30Z</updated>
    <published>2017-11-13T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Titre: ACRICE 2017 PROCEEDINGS FINAL VERSION
Auteur(s): ACRICE 2017
Résumé: Those involved in arms control issues call for more education and outreach activities&#xD;
to promote the aims of international treaties governing weapons systems. This is true&#xD;
for all treaties be they concerned with chemical, biological, nuclear or other&#xD;
radiological weapons. The call for more education has been made largely by those in&#xD;
foreign and defence ministries with hardly any involvement by education ministries.&#xD;
As a result activity on the education front has been limited and local. If outreach&#xD;
activities are to become more widespread and effective a number of questions need&#xD;
addressing. What needs to be said, to whom, and why? What is the evidence that the&#xD;
messages will be effective in achieving the desired goals which, by and large, are the&#xD;
non-use of these indiscriminate weapons? Should everyone be taught about the issues&#xD;
even if they will never use the weapons? Should we treat the education about&#xD;
weapons much as we might the need to wash hands to prevent infections, or the need&#xD;
to learn about managing money to avoid getting into debt? But are the risks the&#xD;
same? Most people are at risk of infections and debt is widespread. Why does this&#xD;
work if the majority of states have got rid of their chemical weapons, for example? Is&#xD;
the odd rogue scientist who might be tempted to make a chemical weapon worth all&#xD;
this trouble? Or is the issue about civilian support for international regimes that&#xD;
police industry what we are after? Why is industry the threat? These and other&#xD;
questions will be explored in this presentation.'</summary>
    <dc:date>2017-11-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

